RT Op-Edge: Why Obama’s ‘red line’ in Syria has turned pink

RT Op-Edge
Patrick Henningsen

Back in August 2012, things were a lot different in Washington DC and in the White House…

The Obama administration was brandishing a confident swagger back then, heading into the elections against a hobbling GOP opponent, and Benghazi had yet to unfold in all of its ugliness.

Syrian army soldiers take control of the village of Western Dumayna, some seven kilometers north of the rebel-held city of Qusayr on May 13, 2013. (AFP Photo / Joseph Eid)

Syrian army soldiers take control of the village of Western Dumayna, some seven kilometers north of the rebel-held city of Qusayr on May 13, 2013. (AFP Photo / Joseph Eid)

As Hillary Clinton was jetting around on the US State Department budget promoting her ‘Friends of Syria’ Middle East and European tours, and as the CIA were busy like bees working in the gray shadows of Benghazi, Washington and London were laying the groundwork for their new WMD case is Syria.

As last summer drew to a close, President Barack Obama confidently announced he was drawing a ‘Red Line’ in Syria regarding the use of chemical weapons, meaning that any evidence of their use on either side of that conflict would lead to consequences, the obvious inference being automatic US military intervention.

Fast forward to the present, and Washington appears to have been caught in the vortex of its own spin machine, with White House Press Secretary Jay Carney recently forced to ‘clarify’ the President’s infamous ‘Red Line’ decree with what can only be described as desperate political cover. Here Carney attempted to explain away the previous ultimatum and re-explain the President’s position:

“What the president made clear is that it was a red line, and that it was unacceptable, and that it would change his calculus… What he never did – and it is simplistic to do so is to say that ‘if X happens, Y will happen’. He has never said what reaction he would take.”

It’s hard to run a global empire and still pander to sensitive liberal concerns at home. The White House seems to be at pains coming to terms with what the Neoconservative Bush government already knew a decade ago – that there really is no good, safe way to do a military intervention. In the end, the façade of political spin cannot provide ethical cover for invading and toppling another sovereign state. You can’t finesse your way into it, you have to just go for it in full view – lie if you have to, fabricate evidence if need be, and be damned with the political fallout…

Read more at RT

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

Stephen Hawking is backing Israel boycott

21st Century Wire says…

Britain’s highest profile scientist has taken a brave public stance by giving Israel the thumbs down…
-

UK physicist reported to have withdrawn from upcoming Israeli conference in Jerusalem as part of an academic boycott.

-
Al Jazeera

British cosmologist Professor Stephen Hawking has announced his withdrawal from an Israeli conference in Jerusalem, prompting reports that he is supporting an academic boycott on the country.

Hawking was due to appear at the conference, hosted by Shimon Peres, the Israeli president, but his name was recently dropped from the list of speakers.

A statement on the website of the British Committee for the Universities of Palestine said: “We understand that Professor Stephen Hawking has declined his invitation to attend the Israeli Presidential Conference, Facing Tomorrow 2013, due to take place in Jerusalem on 18-20 June.

“This is his independent decision to respect the boycott, based upon his knowledge of Palestine, and on the unanimous advice of his own academic contacts there.”

Agencies reported that the University of Cambridge, where Hawking works, confirmed the statement had been approved by the professor…

Read more

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

First ever drone strike from British soil

21st Century Wire says…

Expect US to do secret drone strikes from UK…

The British Royal Force launched it’s first ever drone strike from UK soil.
Prior to this week the British military used a small base located in the Nevada to conduct UAV operations, but according to reports the UK will conduct future missions from their own country.

Many citizens of the United Kingdom have showed their opposition to the use of drones…



facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

From Savile to ‘Street’ – British celebrity child sex abuse scandal hits BBC and beyond

21st Century Wire says…

It’s hard to tell what history’s enduring caption will read when people look back at the BBC, Sir Jimmy Savile OBE and the rest…

One phrase which comes to mind is “institutional cover-up”.
This of course raises the uncomfortable question: can state run institutions above the law and can they still be trusted to govern themselves? 

Are all these actors and DJ’s merely the establishment’s sacrificial lambs, nabbed in order to quell public unrest on this horrific issue? Does this epidemic stretch into the political realm, or further up the food chain? Revelations of the police covering for pedophile MP Sir Cyril Smith indicate that it does.

Perhaps the list below may just be the tip of an incredibly huge iceberg?

Many questions remain unanswered…
-

List of those caught up after Jimmy Savile’s death reveals seemingly seedy side to British pop culture.

David Trifunov and Corinne Purtill
Global Post

LONDON, UK — Two months ago, Stuart Hall – a silver-voiced fixture on UK radio and TV airwaves for more than 50 years – stood in court and called the 40-year-old allegations of sexual misconduct against him “pernicious, callous, cruel and above all spurious.”

On Thursday, Hall, who last year was decorated by the Queen for his contributions to British broadcasting, confessed to 14 sexual crimes against girls as young as 9. Said his lawyer, speaking in the same court where Hall had once defended his innocence: “He is not a man easily moved to self-pity, but he is only too aware that his disgrace is complete.”

Hall, 83, is the latest public figure to emerge from Operation Yewtree, a national police investigation into decades-old sexual crimes of the late TV presenter Jimmy Savile and others. Prompted by the revelation last year that Savile, who died in 2011, allegedly sexually abused hundreds of young people, Metropolitan Police launched a two-month criminal investigation that concluded in December.

From Gary Glitter to Bill Roache, British police have revealed what alleged victims call a seemingly seedy underbelly of perversion where stars use their social position to prey upon young victims.

When he is sentenced next month for assaulting young girls decades ago while working as a British radio and TV personality, he’ll became one of the first caught in the widening scandal to face punishment.

While Hall is just the latest, there are many others still awaiting formal charges or trial.

From BBC and beyond, “Coronation Street” to Operation Yewtree and even (Gasp!) “Dr. Who,” here’s a list of some notable names from recent British celebrity sex scandals:

Jimmy Savile
When the white-haired, bug-eyed, cigar chomping DJ died in October 2011 at age 84, he was resoundingly lauded before quickly being demonized. After his death, as many as 450 victims came forward to claim Savile, host of the ubiquitous music program “Top of the Pops,” abused them.

It’s led to many of Savile’s contemporaries facing similar allegations in what Scotland Yard has dubbed “Operation Yewtree.” The biggest name, to North Americans at least, in the growing drama is probably …

Gary Glitter
Famous for his sports arena anthem, “Rock and Roll: Part 2,” Glitter was among the first stars named from this latest round of scandal to face accusations. British police jailed him in 1999 for possessing kiddie porn. Vietnamese authorities then arrested him for child abuse in 2006, deporting him to England.

He was re-arrested last October as part of the Jimmy Savile scandal, accused of having sex with an underage girl in Savile’s dressing room in the 1970s. Born Paul Gadd, he will turn 69 next week and is sadly not even close to being the oldest of this group. That distinction belongs to …

Stuart Hall
At 83 years old, Hall is proof that police aren’t afraid to dredge up past sins. The veteran TV and radio presenter admitted 14 charges of indecently assaulting girls as young as nine, prosecutors said on Thursday. As face of the TV show “It’s a Knockout” in the 1970s and 1980s, Hall was an “opportunistic predator” who befriended his victims before assaulting them, prosecutors told Agence France-Presse.

Yes, Hall is the oldest to face charges, but is merely months older than the next on the list.

Rolf Harris
Arrested in March on suspicion of sexual offenses and freed until this month, the 83-year-old Australian star’s full extent of trouble is unknown. British police often arrest suspects, but don’t charge them immediately. Harris is best known in America for his song “Tie me Kangaroo Down, Sport,” a hit in 1960.

He was also known for TV roles, much like our next man.

William (Bill) Roache
In the Guinness Book of Records for his 53-year run as Ken Barlow on TV soap “Coronation Street,” Roache is accused of having sex with an underage girl in 1967. Roache, 81, denied the claims after his arrest. He is just the latest “Coronation” star to face such charges.

Michael Le Vell, Andrew Lancel
In the interests of time, we’ll combine these two 40-something actors, although their cases are entirely separate.

Le Vell, charged with sexual abuse of minors, denies all charges and plans a vigorous defense. The 48-year-old actor, a “Street” veteran for 30 years, played mechanic Kevin Webster, but was suspended from the show pending the investigation.

Lancel appeared for two seasons of “Street” in 2011-12 before his character was murdered. The 42-year-old actor entered not guilty pleas last month and will face trial on six counts of indecent assault against a teen boy from the mid-1990s. His trial is to begin in June.

Operation Yewtree
The Savile scandal spawned Yewtree which arrested a dozen and charged two. David Smith (BBC driver, charged with raping teen boy in 1984) and Max Clifford (70-year-old PR guru, charged with 11 counts of indecent assault) will enter pleas before proceedings continue.

Others awaiting formal charges are: Jim Davidson (59, BBC host facing allegations from two women), Freddie Star (70, comedian and game show host accused of groping a woman) and Dave Lee Travis (67, disc jockey who chalks up his accusations to “giving them a cuddle”).

John Nathan-Turner, Gary Downie
The two men behind the scenes at the long-running “Doctor Who” sci-fi series preyed upon fans, a new book written by former BBC producer Richard Marson alleges.

Nathan-Turner served as a producer during the 1980s, while Downie worked as a production manager. The book, “JN-T: The Life and Scandalous Times of John Nathan-Turner,” accuses the men of promising fans access to the show in exchange for sex. Nathan-Turner died in 2002 and Downie four years later.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

Above the Law: What’s Behind Israel’s Latest Military Rampage Over Syria?

21st Century Wire says…

In a flagrant and overt violation of International Law, the state of Israel has used Lebanese airspace to carry out a sustained bombing campaign in Syria. The reason Israel does not respect its neighbors is simple – because they do not have to…

Syria has kept the peace with Israel for nearly 40 years, which makes this latest attack by Israel all the more worrying. Now Israel has joined NATO and the Gulf monarchs’ dog pile on top of Syria.

If any other country did what Israel has done, it would spark an emergency meeting of the UN and result in an international outcry against the aggressor nation – branding them as a ‘rogue state’. But not with Israel – there exists a double standard of hypocrisy when it comes to holding Israel accountable for anything. Internationally, it is above the law, and does what it pleases in the full knowledge that no one would dare tell it not to. Do not expect either the UN, the US, or NATO to say a word against Israel, who have all but declared war on Syria.

The death toll is unknown as yet, but based on the size of the strikes, it could be hundreds, or maybe thousands of innocent civilians and innocent security forces – all dead as a result of Israel’s “strategic” operation.

Does Syria have the right “to defend itself”?

Firstly, don’t expect John Kerry to say a word regarding Israel’s latest attack on a neighboring country. 

Israel (and the US speaking on behalf of Israel) often justifies its various aggressions as part of its “right to defend itself”. Does Syria have the same right? As it’s being attacked by foreign powers and international sanctions, is it allowed to arm itself against invading terrorist armies?

It will be interesting to see what Israel’s excuse is for pushing the region closer to an all out war. Already the media have taken the Israeli propaganda bait saying that Israel was targeting “suspected chemical weapons facilities“, or “stopping arms shipments to Hezbollah“, or “they have dangerous new SCUD missiles that are a threat to Israeli security”. Neither will ever be proven to be true, but they serve as headline fillers while the dust settles, and the agenda rolls forward. 


Meanwhile, Israeli apologist and British Foreign Secretary William Hague, could not seem to find the tongue to criticize his ‘friends’ in Israeli, instead he has opted (predictably) to use the unprovoked Israeli strike as justification for Western intervention and more weapons for NATO-favored guerrilla opposition terrorists in Syria. Hague somehow feels that, ‘Israeli air strikes on Syria show that peace across the whole region is under threat, and reinforces the need to lift the arms embargo to Syrian rebels’.

Interesting (albeit creative) logic, but it shows clearly that the Israeli airstrikes were not only OK’d but also coordinated in advance with full knowledge of both the US and the UK leadership. By targeting Syrian military targets in Damascus, Israel is helping the opposition guerrillas in destabilising the area, creating chaos. Israel has no doubt been called upon to help soften up Assad – a dirty job, and one that the West or the Arab monarchs cannot be seen doing with their own hands just yet. Israel is the only country who could pull it off as they seem to exist outside of all international law or diplomacy. The US, UK, Turkey, Saudi, Jordan and Qatar are, without a doubt, very happy with this result…

Israel has been given this green light in order to assist the West in advancing its somewhat lagging timetable in the region, and in exchange Israel will be given more land for its state, starting with a significant portion of the Golan Heights.

What’s worse now, is that by the Israeli criminal action in full view, these latest attacks are a signal to all outside powers to help themselves to the destruction of Syria, and further strengthen the west’s Islamic Jihadist agenda to split Syria into to sections – a plan which will all be ensure a permanent state of conflict and Western military presence in the region for years to come.

Job done Mr Hague, and your “friends of Syria”…
-

Israel strikes Syria again, rocking Damascus

Dominic Evans, Oliver Holmes
Daily Star

-
BEIRUT: Israel carried out its second air strike in days on Syria early on Sunday, a Western intelligence source said, in an attack that shook Damascus with a series of powerful blasts and drove columns of fire into the night sky.

Israel declined comment but Syria accused the Jewish state of striking a military facility just north of the capital – one which its jets had first targeted three months ago. Iran, a key ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and an arch-enemy for Israel, urged states in the region to resist the Israeli attack.

People living near the Jamraya base spoke of explosions over several hours in various places near Damascus, including a town housing senior officials: “Night turned into day,” one man said.

The Western intelligence source told Reuters the operation hit Iranian-supplied missiles headed for Lebanon’s Hezbollah, a similar target to the two previous strikes this year, which have been defended as justifiable by Israel’s ally the United States:

“In last night’s attack, as in the previous one, what was attacked were stores of Fateh-110 missiles that were in transit from Iran to Hezbollah,” the intelligence source said.

An Israeli official had confirmed a similar raid on Friday. In Lebanon, Hezbollah declined immediate comment.

Video footage uploaded onto the Internet by activists showed a series of explosions. One lit up the skyline of Damascus while another sent up a tower of flames and secondary blasts.

Syrian state media accused Israel of attacking in response to Assad’s forces’ recent successes against rebels who, with Western approval, have been trying to topple him for two years.

In 40 years since a war with a Syria then ruled by Assad’s father, Israel has been locked in a cold standoff with Damascus, fought Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006 and is threatening to attack Iran, accusing Tehran of trying to develop nuclear weapons.

But it is wary of instability in Syria, has long viewed Hezbollah as the more immediate threat and has shown little enthusiasm for U.S. and European calls for Assad’s overthrow.

The raid follows intense debate in the United States over whether the use of chemical weapons by Syrian troops might push President Barack Obama to intervene more forcefully on the rebel side, but Western powers remain concerned at the presence of anti-Western Islamist fighters among Assad’s opponents.

It was unclear whether Israel sought U.S. approval for the action; in the past, officials have indicated that Israel sees a need only to inform Washington once a mission was under way.

At a routine public appearance, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made no direct reference to the strikes but spoke pointedly of his responsibility to ensure Israel’s future.

He maintained a plan to fly to China later in the day, suggesting a confidence that, as with the raid in January, Assad – and Hezbollah – would limit any reprisal. However, an Israeli military source said the army had deployed more anti-missile defence systems near the northern borders in recent days.

NIGHT OF EXPLOSIONS

“The sky was red all night. We didn’t sleep a single second. The explosions started after midnight and continued through the night,” one man told Reuters from Hameh, less than a mile from the Jamraya military research facility.

“There were explosions on all sides of my house,” he added, saying people hid in basements during the events.

Another witness spoke of fire near Qura al-Assad, a town around 5 km (3 miles) west of Jamraya where many high-level government officials live. In the centre of Damascus, people said their first thought was that there was an earthquake.

Identified by Syrian media as the Jamraya military research centre, the target was also hit by Israel in another assault on Jan. 30. Jamraya, on the northern approaches to Damascus, is just 15 km (10 miles) from the Lebanese border.

The British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the blasts hit Jamraya as well as a nearby ammunition depot.

Other activists said a missile brigade and two Republican Guard battalions may also have been targeted in the heavily militarised area just north of Damascus.

Reports by activists and state media are difficult to verify in Syria because of restrictions on journalists operating there.

People living in southern Lebanon said they heard frequent sounds of jets overhead and believed they were Israeli.

The streets of central Damascus were almost empty of pedestrians and traffic on Sunday morning, the start of the working week. Only a few shops were open. Checkpoints that have protected the government-controlled zone from rebel attack appeared to have been reinforced with additional men.

Syria’s state television said the strikes were a response to recent military gains by Assad’s forces against rebels: “The new Israeli attack is an attempt to raise the morale of the terrorist groups which have been reeling from strikes by our noble army,” it said.

Speaking shortly before Sunday’s attack, President Obama said Israel had a right to act: “The Israelis justifiably have to guard against the transfer of advanced weaponry to terrorist organisations like Hezbollah,” he said.

In Israel, a military spokeswoman said of the attack in Syria: “We don’t respond to this kind of report.”

Netanyahu appeared at the dedication of a highway junction in memory of his late father. He made no reference to raids but said his father “taught me that the greatest responsibility we have is to ensure Israel’s security and guarantee its future.”

MISSILE “BETTER THAN SCUD”

Israel has repeatedly made clear it is prepared to use force to prevent advanced weapons from Syria reaching Hezbollah, who fought a 34-day war with Israel seven years ago.

Uzi Rubin, an Israeli missile expert and former defence official said the Fateh-110 missile “is better than the Scud, it has a half-ton warhead”. Iran has said it adapted the missile for anti-ship use by installing a guidance system, he added.

With Assad battling the revolt, Israelis also worry that Islamist rebels among the majority Sunni Muslim population could loot his arsenals and eventually hit the Jewish state, ending four decades of relative cross-border calm.

There was no immediate indication of how Syria would respond to Sunday’s attack. After Israel’s January raid, Damascus protested to the United Nations and the Syrian ambassador to Lebanon promised a “surprise decision”, but no direct military retaliation followed.

Iranian Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi was quoted by the ISNA news agency as saying on Sunday: “The Zionist regime’s attack on Syria, which occurred with the U.S.’s green light, revealed the relationship between mercenary terrorists and their supporters and the regime occupying Jerusalem … The evil actions of the Zionist regime can threaten the security of the entire region.”

The uprising against Assad began with street protests that were met with force and grew into a bloody civil war in which the United Nations says at least 70,000 people have been killed.

Assad has lost control of large areas of north and eastern Syria, and is battling rebels on the fringes of Damascus.

Read more

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

Why is Britain now spending millions ‘training’ Palestinian security forces?

Patrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire


They were the inventors of the modern “protectorate” system of overseas colonial government. Now it seems that Britain is repositioning itself to play a more central role in the future of Middle East affairs – as the masters of ‘divide and rule’ are currently digging their heals into Israel’s occupied Palestinian territory. 

Even with austerity at home, there seems to be room for funding the British training of the Palestinian Security Forces – a job formerly taken on by the US – but to what end?

Political arguments are spinning on both sides of this story. Much is made in some media circles (see article posted below) of allegations that the Palestinian Security Forces (many of them unarmed, and all of them under-resourced compared to any normal police force) are torturing their rival Hamas detainees and other “pro-democracy activists” – an interesting scenario to note, but even if it is true, it would certainly pale in comparison to the state-run epidemic which we know exists on the other side of the wall.

The function of creating a Palestinian torture narrative is first to deflect from the fact that Palestine is still occupied by Israel (some American and European voters are still not aware of this fact) and then discredit the Palestinians as being unable to ever attain the necessary “international standards” worthy of a bid for statehood, and secondly, to provide a convenient smokescreen for Israel’s own every expanding wrap sheet of torturing political detainees, including child prisoner offenses outlined by Britain’s own fact-finding team as recently as last summer 2012.

By contrast, the US, Britain and of course, Israel – routinely employ torture as standard practice – all very well documented, as are standard torture by the UK allies in the region – starting with Bahrain. These sort of ethical breaches have proved to be meaningless however, in a 21st century where what is either moral and legal have become nibble concepts for the West and their strategic allies.

No one is asking whether or not the US, or British, have actually been training the Palestinian Security forces in torture techniques – this being more likely a realistic scenario because the US and UK have both the knowledge and the means to do so – and will do so if they can parlay this to theirs, or Israel’s own advantage. One can never be sure these days. It’s so hard to tell because torture by Western countries is now done offshore - and in secret.

Britain is now a player in the region

Britain’s role alongside the US in the Middle East is now on the increase – with troops currently stationed in Jordan, providing support for jihadist rebels in Syria, lucrative BAE Systems arms sales to the Gulf States monarchies, a permanent army barracks in Bahrain, another military outpost on the cards in the UAE – all alongside the UK army’s recent  announcement of plans to build up a strong “shadow presence” in the Gulf.

Why would the UK spend so much of its money on a project in Palestine - what do they expect to receive in return?

If millions are being invested in training any overseas force, the colonial objective will normally be to deliberately disconnect that foreign military force from its political leadership, thus making it easier to influence and control from the outside. Perhaps this is what Britain is doing, but like the efforts of the British fugitive Middle East envoy Tony Blair, all these millions of dollars have done very little to actually help the condition of the Palestinian people – especially those entrapped in Gaza. Despite all of the road maps and peace talks, illegal Israeli settlements are still on the increase and the Palestinian situation is as dire as ever.

Helped by the City’s supply of cheap money, and the Gulf states’ petrol and gas dollars, the UK’s arms suppliers are cashing in on the war-time economy once again – but why are they investing in the Palestinian Security forces? Will the remnants of Palestine be turned back over to British control in future – with Qatar as its chief operating partner for that project? Better yet, are the British planning to extract a new breed of jihadist fighters out of Palestine to fight in Syria and other locations, or facilitate the transfer of Palestinian suicide bombers to help the other British-supported foreign variety already in Syria – or even preparing for a coming border clash/crisis with Egypt?

Recent history should teach us that when it comes to western intervention in Middle Eastern geopolitics - anything is possible, and that no Western power intervenes for altruistic reasons. We can only guess what is Britain’s game at this point – and one can be sure that it’s not all about “helping those poor Palestinians’.

Britain are historically the brains of the geopolitical chessboard and employ others like the US to do the heavy lifting. Let’s wait and see what this is leading up to, but one thing is sure – things are already taking shape…
-

Britain spending millions to train Palestinian security forces despite rights concerns

World Tribune

LONDON — Britain, despite allegations of torture, has been playing a major role in training and financing Palestinian security forces in the West Bank.


Officials acknowledged that the government of British Prime Minister David Cameron was pumping tens of millions of euros to maintain PA intelligence and security agencies.

The officials said Britain has been training and advising virtually every major PA security force, often in coordination with the United States.

Officials said Britain’s MI6 foreign intelligence agency has repeatedly urged PA security commanders to stop torture. But they acknowledged that torture and abuse continued in PA detention facilities against Hamas suspects and pro-democracy activists.

The International Development Department said the government would spend 2.2 million pounds [$3.4 million] to increase oversight of PA security forces. A statement by the department said Britain was also seeking to develop a Palestinian judiciary in the West Bank. 

“Through DFID’s Supporting Stability and Promoting Democracy Program we will endeavor to help the Palestinian Authority to become more open and accountable,” International Development Minister Alan Duncan said. 

In an address on April 10 in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Duncan said the aid was meant to help the PA establish a Palestinian state. He said the PA has “proved its capability to deliver services and security.”

Officials said MI6 was helping PA intelligence and security agencies. They said MI6, with an office in Jerusalem, was overseeing the training of mid-level and senior officers from the General Intelligence Service and the Preventive Security Apparatus. 

The British Daily Mail said London’s aid to the PA security forces comes amid renewed testimony of widespread torture. On March 30, the Mail quoted a former PA security official who outlined the tools of torture used by investigators against Palestinians. “If you are not sure of the case, I assure you, torture is not going to be used,” the former official, who did not want to be identified, said. “But if you feel you’re not getting what you want — well, then the decision will depend on the investigator’s patience and the importance of the information he needs.” 

“Our funding is channeled through a World Bank Trust Fund and is linked to a program of government reforms,” Duncan, who did not discuss the torture issue, said. “This on-going commitment allows the PA to maintain autonomy over its finances which is a sign of our continuing trust in the Palestinian Authority.”

-
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

Britain and France claim ‘evidence’ of Syrian Forces using chemical weapons

21st Century Wire says… It looks like Britain and France’s turn to carry the lowly WMD torch to the UN, begging for military intervention in Syria based on fabricated claims of chemical weapons used by the Syrian military...

RT

Britain and France have addressed the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon with allegations that Syria has used chemical weapons on multiple occasions since December, according to reports emerging from top diplomats and officials.

The message came in the form of a letter, claiming that soil samples, witness interviews and statements from opposition sources support the idea that nerve agents had been used in and around Aleppo, Homs and supposedly the capital, Damascus. The officials chose to speak on condition of anonymity.

The case revolves around the supposed find of an agent “similar to sarin” in a soil sample, though it has not been revealed where the sample came from or what kind of chemical it is exactly.

President Assad’s administration has repeatedly denied the allegations, insisting that the rebels were behind the Aleppo attack on March 19, which took the lives of 26 people, including Syrian soldiers.

The European diplomats are hoping to prove that any damage inflicted upon the Syrian army was a case of friendly fire, in which a government shell supposedly missed its target.

A day after the alleged attack, Syrian envoy to the UN Bashar Jaafari called for an “impartial” probe to confirm the use of chemical weapons by the opposition, an idea backed by the Russian government. The UN chief agreed to the request, but the effort has since been marred by a disagreement over the scope of the probe, with Britain, France and the US insisting on a wider investigation throughout Syria. The UN inspectors have still not been given access.

The international body has asked Britain, France and Syria to give more detailed information and additional cooperation on the matter. UN officials say an inspection team will probably be sent to Britain to examine the sample in question, and that refugee testimonies from around the camps outside Syria will be gathered…

Read more

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

BBC Shoot Themselves in Foot Again Trying to Preserve Thatcher’s Thorny Legacy

21st Century Wire

LONDON – The ‘legacy thing’ is especially hard to manage when large swaths of the population feel that a former political puppet was completely on the wrong side of history.

Just ask Tony Blair, who is a shoe-in to grace the annals of history as one of most evil, money-orientated and unapologetic leaders in history. But this year’s fury has been reserved for the ‘The Iron Lady’, who many Britons believe laid the groundwork for the elitist, dysfunctional, closing society and greed-plagued political culture the country is unfortunately witnessing today.

rasouli_amir20130413063358913
PHOTO: Revelers at one of London’s most radically socialist and infamously irreverent boozers, The Queens Head in Brixton, South London, deliver their verdict as to the legacy of Thatcherism. Residents in the Borough of Lambeth also staged other protests and street parties following Thatcher’s passing this week.

If the controversy wasn’t enough, it appears that the BBC – an ardent defender of their golden boy and paedophile Sir Jimmy Savile’s legacy (the BBC buried Savile revelations in order to protect their investment in Savile TV programming) – has jumped to the defense of Savile’s close friend, the late Margaret Thatcher, by censoring what is clearly the most popular song this week in the UK. 

Hasn’t the BBC learned that it’s job is not to protect legacies? One has to admit, when it’s forced to take rear-guard action like this, the BBC is sinking further and further to depths uncharted – and further away from the hearts and minds of its license-paying public. Clearly, they are officially “out of touch” with the British public who like it or not, have nominated this as the week’s number one track (we have a feeling this will back-fire badly on the BBC, and will catapult the same track to number one again next week).

Some still might be asking though, why would anyone celebrate the death of Margaret Thatcher? Answer: Ask a Chilean… or a Cambodian. It seems that DJ Jimmy wasn’t the unsavoury friend of the Iron Lady.

According to news reports, this is the song the BBC have sought to suppress this week (no kidding)…



The BBC has come under fire for a decision not to air a song, which has hit top of the charts after the death of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, in its weekly music countdown show.

The song, “Ding Dong! The witch is dead” from the 1939 movie The Wizard of Oz, is now contending to gain the top slot in Britain’s weekly list of the top 40 best-selling singles that are usually played in full on a BBC Radio 1 chart show on Sunday. 

However, the BBC has announced it will only air a 5-second clip of the 51 second song in the form of a news broadcast, with the BBC director Tony Hall saying the “tasteless” and inappropriate song may offend Thatcher’s supporters while banning it may lead to public outrage. 

Thatcher’s death on Monday led to a hail of “Thatcher death parties” on the streets of different cities across Britain including Glasgow, London, Belfast and Manchester. 

The protesters also took to the internet to voice their pleasure at the 87-year-old ex-PM’s death, with the word “witch” becoming a rally point for her opponents both on the web and on the streets.

Source: Press TV

RELATED: 
Thatcher Gets Final Thrashing From MP During Commons ‘Tribute’ Session

-
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

Thatcher Gets Thrashing During House of Commons ‘Tribute’ Session

Thatcher-Savile21st Century Wire says… As the gushing tributes to Margaret Thatcher continue on through the week, a recent ‘tribute’ session in the British House of Commons saw MP Glenda Jackson from Hackney, East London (herself an arch-socialist), go for the posthumous jugular, ripping the final veneers off of the Iron Lady’s chequered (don’t mention her close friend Jimmy Savile OBE here) political career. Somewhat detached from the true public mood, Tory bench-warmers were visibly upset during the exchange, as they had hoped for an outpouring of love for the late Prime Minister but instead got just the opposite which puts Thatcher’s legacy into question… based on demonstrations around UK, the popular consensus this week being that she was ‘on the wrong side of history’. 

One wonders if Tony Blair will one day receive similar retrospectives for his sparkling political career. 

Watch here…


It’s perhaps too painful to revisit at least one unredacted loving correspondence between the late Baroness Thatcher and Sir Jimmy Savile OBE - a letter recently declassified on FOI from the National Archives in Kew, West London.

From the Mail: “The letter, part of a Savile file released under the 30-year rule by the National Archives at Kew today, reveals how well-connected to the establishment he was… But parts of some exchanges between Savile and Mrs Thatcher were censored in October this year – eight days after claims that he had sexually abused people surfaced in an ITV documentary.”

Read it for yourself…



Why were Savile and Thatcher so close? What could a Prime Minister and an insatiable criminal like Savile possibly have in common that would allow him to be her private guest at Chequers Court – the country house retreat of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom - over so many Christmas holidays? 

Now then, now then…

-
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest

Margaret Thatcher Dead: Parties To Celebrate Former PM’s Death

The Huffington Post UK/PA

Hundreds of people gathered in city centres to hold street parties “celebrating” the death of Baroness Thatcher on Monday night.

In Glasgow revellers popped champagne while chanting “so long the witch is dead” while in Brixton one critic reorganised the letters on Ritzy Cinema’s hoarding to say “Margaret Thatcher’s dead lol.”

Police said they deployed officers to deal with around hundred people in Brixton causing “low level disorder including throwing missiles at officers.” Two women were arrested on suspicion of burglary after a shop front was smashed.

The event, organised on Facebook and Twitter, was attended by younger protesters angry at Thatcher’s legacy, as well as those who had lived through her time as Prime Minister.

A 20-year-old swigging deliberately from a bottle of milk, told the Huffington Post UK: “Cameron is just finishing off what Thatcher started.”


Lambeth Labour councillor Alex Bigham branded the event “disgraceful” on Twitter. Replying to one user of the micro-blogging site who had posted a link to the ‘Thatcher death party’ he described the party as “tasteless posturing.”

Riots took place in Brixton in 1981 during Thatcher’s time in power. Although many argued unemployment and racism lay behind the disturbances, Thatcher insisted: “Nothing, but nothing, justifies what happened.”

Another riot happened in Brixton in 1985, sparked by the shooting of Dorothy ‘Cherry’ Groce by police. Officers believed her son Michael Groce, who they were seeking for a suspected firearms offence, was hiding in the house.

He was not in the house and police were accused of not giving the required warning before firing. Cherry Groce was paralysed from the waist down and later received compensation from the Met Police.

Crowds gathered from 5pm, despite a statement from Glasgow City Council discouraging anyone from attending the event.

In somewhat ambiguous comments, a spokesman said there were health and safety issues for banning the event.

“Regardless of whether or not it’s appropriate to have a party to celebrate someone dying, this event was organised without involvement or consent from the council and we have safety concerns for anyone attending.

“Organisers of legitimate events must get permission to use the square. They must also satisfy the council that they will take safety precautions such as providing first aiders, sufficient public toilets and stewards, as well as obtaining public liability insurance. We urge people to stay away.”

However Members of organisations including the Anti-Bedroom Tax Federation, the Communist Party, the Socialist Party, the Socialist Working Party, the International Socialist Group, were joined by members of the public in Glasgow’s George Square later on Monday.

Anti-capitalist campaigners shouted from loudspeakers, “Maggie, Maggie, Maggie” as the crowd replied “dead, dead, dead”.

Many came prepared with cardboard party hats and streamers. Bryan Simpson, 24, who is a member of executive council for Unite the Union created the Facebook event page, Thatcher’s Deed – Party in George Square – Tonight!

More than 1,000 people said they would attend via the social networking site, with a number of people referring to the stroke that killed her as “a stroke of good luck”.

There were four other similar event pages created via Facebook calling people to attend the “death party”.

There has been preparation for the day Margaret Thatcher died for many years. Martin Chomsky, the lead singer of Chomsky Allstars, penned the song So Long Margaret Thatcher a number of years ago.

He performed the song in George Square and said: “There are mixed emotions. I was never brought up to celebrate anyone’s death but the pain she brought to Latin America, Europe and around the world should be remembered.

“I would rather that Thatcherism was dead because she is mostly to blame for what is going on today.

“She is responsible, but not solely, for the massive gap between the rich and the poor.”

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest