21st Century Wire says…
Another day, another horrific public attack, this one made for TV…
Details are still speculative at this stage as to who was the victim and exactly who were the assailants reported to have been shot dead by the police, but the event has already been defined across the national/world media as two “muslim anti-government” attackers killing an “off duty British soldier”.
Oddly, media reports say that the men were shot dead, while Police statement says that the men are being treated for their injuries at separate hospitals. Which is it? If they are dead, then sadly, police will not be able to question the men believed to have killed the victim so as to learn more about what actually happened – and why.
Common sense should dictate that this should not be classed as a “national security” event, as it appears to be only a violent crime – but it’s one of the strangest ones ever, spun with an Islamic twist, and where the perps (breathtakingly) are demanding to be filmed and then hang around for police to arrive? Something does not add up.
Whether this is either a real or staged event, rather than be seen as an isolated incident, this incident will – without a doubt, be defined as a ‘disturbing trend’ with the interim details being filled in by the tabloid press, and will be used to bolster any existing domestic security provisions and strengthen police powers of pre-emptive detainment and arrest under national security clauses. The danger is that it will be used to introduce an entirely new set of state powers to be dropped on top of an already bloated security state in Britain.
Video #1 (ITN):
Video #2 – News footage…
Now bear in mind also that this could be viewed as the most staged media-friendly attack ever, it’s almost humorous that the attacker appears to have red paint on his hands – but amazingly no blood at all on his clothing, nor is there any blood around the victim – so skeptics will say that’s actually impossible. Decide for yourself…
And here’s the same man ranting, but with no blood on his hands, is this “take one”? Why has the video released by ITN, the Guardian and others have red hands? Very odd, it’s either a different take, or whoever handled the video for the UK media has later added the red hands for effect – NOTE: These two videos (#1 and #4) were shot from two different cameras, and it appears that one of these videos has been altered…
If the assailants had run over the man first with their vehicle before setting upon him it’s doubtful at best that they would have known he was an off duty soldier – which would make the event a coincidence according to the parameters laid out in the official story. So the premeditated political targeting of a soldier as a talking point does not add at all. No one has actually confirmed that the victim was actually “decapitated” as the corporate media suggest. And the ‘machetes’ look to be merely household kitchen knives in reality…
In fact, beyond the random spectacle narrative, very little about this event adds up at all.
Here’s a question to be answered: Was the assailant at any time working as an MI5 informant?
READ MORE WOOLWICH NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Woolwich Files