Transatlantic Union: Scandals, Scoundrels and Global Trade Partners?

By Shawn Helton
21st Century Wire

For the past two weeks we’ve seen the Obama administration embroiled in controversy, as three separate scandals continue to grow and attach themselves to the White House.

While this is major news, and does have the power to topple this U.S. President, there are other far-reaching actions unfolding under his watch…

In a bizarre move, President Obama, held two joint press conferences last week, one with U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron and another with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Perhaps the dual Presidential podiums were a subliminal touch to what seemed to blur the line between world leaders, in a sense, becoming rule by global council. This strange observation may well be significant to understanding the kind of dark partnerships that are developing world-wide.

Rightly, most of the media will focus on the obvious take down of an empire, as they try to uncover the truth about Benghazi, IRS, and the DOJ. However, on the global chess board of finance and war, more stark revelations have come to light involving the U.S. President. During the press conference with Prime Minister Cameron, President Obama, made vague sweeping statements about a Transatlantic Partnership with the E.U. A partnership that many fear will lead to a Transatlantic Union which will impose more globalized standards and regulations, potentially derailing individual free trade.

This was made clear by The New American earlier this year:

“The “Transatlantic Partnership,” of course, is just one of the major sovereignty-threatening international schemes being pursued by the Obama administration simultaneously — closer North American Integration and the so-called “Trans-Pacific Partnership” are two of the most prominent efforts. The latest plot, though, has far-reaching, global implications that critics argue represent a serious threat to America and freedom. If the U.S.-EU deal ends up becoming reality, the regulatory regime governing the new bloc, which accounts for about half of global GDP, would become the de-facto standard-setting entity for the entire planet.”

Obama-CameronObama had this to say during the Cameron press conference:

“With respect to the relationship between the U.K. and the EU, we have a special relationship with the United Kingdom. And we believe that our capacity to partner with a United Kingdom that is active, robust, outward-looking and engaged with the world is hugely important to our own interests as well as the world. And I think the U.K.’s participation in the EU is an expression of its influence and its role in the world, as well as obviously a very important economic partnership”.

Obama echoed the same rhetoric at the Erdogan press conference adding: “Today, we focused on three areas that I want to highlight. First, we agreed to keep expanding trade and investment. Over the past four years, our trade has surged and U.S. exports to Turkey have more than doubled. As the United States pursues a new trade and investment partnership with the EU, I want to make sure that we also keep deepening our economic ties with Turkey. So we’re creating a new high-level committee that will focus on increasing trade and investment between our two countries and will help fuel Turkish innovation. And the progress that Turkey’s economy has made over the last several years I think has been remarkable and the Prime Minister deserves much credit for some of the reforms that are already taking place.”

It seems that more and more we’re faced with a manufactured reality, one in which international institutions will have dictatorial power over trade and the economy world-wide. Breaking away from sovereign entities controlling their own destiny.

Is the transatlantic partnership a sleeping giant for the global economy? What other partnerships are being harbored in regards to U.S., Britain and Turkey? How does this tie into the situation in Syria?



Writer Patrick Henningsen delves further into this in a recent op-ed for Russia Today news: “On Wednesday Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul(R) weighed in on the Benghazi debacle, in a direct challenge to the President and Hillary Clinton, inferring that the Sept. 11, 2012 attack unfolded as a result of a secret arms trade, and rubbishing the previous government line put forward by Susan Rice and the US Intelligence community that the attack was a result of a YouTube film, “The Innocence of Muslims”. During a recent CNN interview Paul explains:

“I’ve actually always suspected that, although I have no evidence, that maybe we were facilitating arms leaving Libya going through Turkey into Syria,” he said. “Were they trying to obscure that there was an arms operation going on at the CIA annex?”

One can only conclude that those in the world who are making economic reforms aligned to a socialist “pay your fair share” tax scheme, can also control the narrative on world events. Creating a new kind of “strategy of tension” by forcing countries to be complicit in illegal activities, via their trade partnerships. Is the new growing economic partnership, a partnership in conflict and consolidation?



READ MORE NWO NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire NWO Files


-facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterest




  • ponerology

    Did anyone vote for any of this? Trans-Atlantic trade deal? G8? G20? Kyoto protocol? Agenda 21?
    Oh yeah, I forgot…..our votes are a joke anyway. All of the so-called “national” political parties are run by the Royal Institute for Int’l Affairs and the Council(s) on Foreign Relations (which are world-wide).
    David Cameron states in the video that the trans-atlantic (screwjob) agreement needs to ensure corporations will be held to account regarding the taxes they pay or don’t pay (blah, blah, blah)–and citizens will be able to hold their govts to account! Really? Since when? I wasn’t asked whether I want a G8 or G20 or trans-atlantic treat, or NATO, or the U.N. or a World Bank.
    Where did they find this guy? He is a poor stand-up comedian; although he does deliver the most hilarious lines like a straight man.

    Get ready for the North American “bail-in” (a.k.a. “haircut”) over to the “struggling” EU–which are euphemisms for THEFT of your money DIRECTLY out of your accounts over to the Bank of International Settlements and the IMF which are privately run and privately owned institutions. It’s all going to very legal so don’t fret over the legalities. About 12 families at the very, very top really “count”. The rest of you (in the billions) are completely expendable. Austerity means you pay or redistribute your measly wealth over to those who already own the planet AND its resources. None of the bail-in(s) or “bail-outs” go to ‘help the poor’ or ‘third world’ populations. It goes into the coffers of the mega, transnational corporations. Don’t forget, you’re a human resource don’t you know?

    So, not happy with your “haircut”? Go complain to the Bank for International Settlements or the IMF, World Bank, U.N. Go ahead, complain. Boo hooo hooo.

  • disqus_0bRejDWmsL

    The corporate elect voted for this on behalf of its own interests…