More results...

Nuclear Hype: Russian & British Relations ‘Are in Dangerous Place’

May 31, 2016 By Stuart Hooper 6 Comments

21st Century Wire says…

Is the hype real?

In the following excerpt from Going Underground, Afshin Rattansi interviews the head of Britain’s Foreign Affairs Committee on the state of British-Russian relations Crispin Blunt.

Blunt believes the state of relations between the two nations is in a ‘dangerous place’, and does not appear to rule out the possibility of open war between them.

While some believe NATO and Russia are on a collision course thanks to Russian actions, it can easily be seen that the real aggressor here is actually NATO.

See the full interview here:

Get 10% off a 21WIRE TV membership package today using promo code: STU21WIRETV

THE REAL STORY ON RUSSIA: 21st Century Wire Russia Files

Filed Under: Featured, International News, Stuart Hooper Tagged With: Britain, Crimea, Intervention, NATO, Nuclear War, Russia, Syria, UK, Ukraine, World War 3

Penelope Powell

US/UK/Israel/banking cabal/NWOers– whatever you want to call them– won’t attack Russia or China. They are presently winning. The continued empowerment of the international institutions which are bleeding the sovereign powers of all nations is a demonstration of their success, as is the spread of chaos in Africa, the mideast and South America. The collapse of the dollar will merely usher in the next monetary system, also controlled by the NWO banking cabal. Even China, Russia & Iran belong to the WTO and Russia to the Fed/IMF system. Newly under control of the UN (really the bankers) is the global development and use of energy resources. What flows from this last is too immense to be listed here. So they are winning. Do you really think they’re going to push the button marked high-risk and chaos among their own power structure?? I don’t.

So what’s all the scare rhetoric for? They’ve accomplished innumerable hoaxes over the years– most recently various nonexistent “terrorist” attacks. They were preparing for a phoney nuclear war. To be sure, SOME nukes will have to be fired– enough to scare people into their one world state. I have been expecting this move for a long while. Perhaps some worthless (to them) country will be annhilated– Romania or Poland maybe. Obviously it requires some Russian cooperation. Perhaps not willingly.

Is all of this wrong, mere nuttery? Perhaps, but if you were bent on setting up the NWO would you insist on conquering even your strongest opponents, or would you try to buy them off with hegemony over adjoining territory and other powers? In fact, if one looks at old books from the 40s and 50s the oligarchs were explicit about dividing the world into a few segments. China was always a very big part of these plans, and i really don’t find a few scrappy words about the China Sea especially compelling– not compared to the decades of Western investment credits, technology transfers, and about 5 state-of-the-art R&D facilities. James Corbett’s a fair source on this.

It’s still probably nuttery, but I can’t get out of my mind several contradictions to the conventional interpretation that Russia and the US are at daggers drawn. One of these contradictions: If Russia is militarily invulnerable, what in the world keeps her from economic sovereignty? Why not increase her own currency and create her own investment credits? Why should Russia be in recession due to loss of Western investment?

There are other contradictions, but this is long enough. All this bothers me greatly and I hope that I’m wrong .
- MyNameisJonas
  
  You are not wrong. The Eurasianist versus Atlanticist hegemonic battle is another controlled system in the Hegelian Dialectic contrived by so called “elitists.” It is no mistake that Wall Street bankers such as the Schiff family played such a big role in the Bolshevik Revolution as well as the pillaging and ownership hijacking of the resources in Russia after the break up of the Soviet Union. On the Anglo-American end the social justice warriors have already been brainwashed by the organizations funded by Rockefeller and Soros, and are jumping up and down to implement a new socialist system that will make Obama’s tyrannical regime seem tame.
  - Penelope Powell
    
    Thank you, MyNameisJonas. There seem to be amazingly few people who are willing to consider that the good guy/bad guy, Russia & China vs the bad guys story could be a deception. I’m heartened that you are familiar with the Hegelian dialectic, in which two positions or groups are clashed in order to bring about the resolution that is desired by the oligarchs. Rockefeller interests control more than 3,000 organizations to engineer US society.
    
    Another reason I find the Russian v US story doubtful is the Sinai Crash of the Russian passenger plane. The crash site looked entirely phoney to me– especially the lack of any impact craters for any of the parts. The fragile wings, still connected by a small bit of aircraft apparently floated out of the sky, landed right-side up w/o damage, then were blackened by fire but no explosion. The obvious use of the “crash” was to make Russians accept the escalation of Russian action in Syria, which is not terrible. However the UK and US imm’y helped put the story across w their intelligence reports that it was a bomb, etc. OK, cooperation regarding fighting ISIS doesn’t necessarily mean cooperation in all things, but is a cause for suspicion.
    
    Thanks for “listening”. The idea of ‘forbidden thoughts’ has become tedious to me.
    
    http://killtown.911review.org/flight93/crash-comparisons.html what the impact craters of real plane crashes look like.
eddysachs

Spreading more Fear Porn & War Mongering with ‘Sensationalist’ headlines?…shame on you Pat
Analyze_This_88

I believe that all the war talk and hype by UK is part of a larger effort to bolster UK arms & aerospace sales. Peace is their enemy, no money to be made when relations are good. Parasites.
kolokol

http://johnhelmer.net/?p=15751