Facebook Twitter Google+ Shout YouTube SoundCloud RSS

Gawker says: ‘Arrest Climate-Change Deniers’, But Where Would We Put Them?

21st Century Wire says…

Reality has proven to be a formidable obstacle for the global warming crowd.

This past winter saw a slight adjustment to the climatist propaganda media scheduling. With successive record-breaking cold freezes in recent years, and with climatists themselves becoming the subject of ridicule, the warmists have made a strategic PR decision to hold back most of their climate hysteria stories… until the weather actually gets warmer in the spring.

Even though interest in their church is beginning to wane, like any decent cult, the church of ‘climate change’ will always retain a core of true believers – so long as the donations and federal grants are trickling in anyway.

More than ever, as it falls further and further into irrelevance, the warmist agenda is getting more and more desperate – opting for more radical policies, and also targeting their enemies. Case and point: safe liberal online hang-out, Gawker, published this latest howler by its provocateur Adam Weinstein (photo, left), who is demanding that ‘Climate-Change Deniers Be Arrested’.

Weinstein remarked, “Man-made climate change happens. Man-made climate change kills a lot of people. It’s going to kill a lot more. We have laws on the books to punish anyone whose lies contribute to people’s deaths.”

He adds,”It’s time to punish the climate-change liars.”

Weinstein’s highly irrational rationale is somewhat disturbing, and also disingenuous.

He then screamed that, “Man-made climate change happens.” Really? How exactly does it happen? Unfortunately, and even with all the hype and fear-mongering, no one has yet proven that man-made CO2-induced global warming climate change has caused any ‘extreme weather events’, or sea level rises – let alone, that any deaths were caused by it.  Just because you heard President Obama mention it, does not mean it actually exists.

Just to clarify what should be the boundaries of this great debate, the term “global warming” was first introduced by climatists following a meeting by the Club of Rome in 1991 – and this specifically refers to man-made (anthropogenic) global warming by result of man-made CO2 emissions. In order to widen its catchment area in terms of regularly occurring weather events (hurricane, tornado, floods, droughts, and even heavy snow), climatists later adapted ‘global warming’ into the catch-all term they now use, which is called “climate change”, which is much more elastic and less limiting than old global warming. With ‘climate change’, liberal activists can use free association to build their cases, which is more fun for them. They have that wonderful, child-like glint in their eyes, and they need the whole process of understanding climate to be fun and not so complex in terms of critical thinking, less restrictive – no boundaries. How fun.

Climate campaigners are a funny bunch who will believe anything that supports their political science, but will instantly dismiss anything which challenges it. Consequently, they tend to cherry pick most of their arguments. According to radical climatists, the earth’s climate history only started circa 2005 (if you ask them about anything before that, they tend to get upset) when Al Gore’s documentary, An Inconvenient Truth was released. Climatists also become aggressive and irrational when faced with questions of what caused the sub-tropical Dinosaur Era, the Ice Age, and the Medieval Warming Period. Like we said, reality has always been a problem for the climate jihad.

One obvious nugget of reality which has eluded many a climate cult follower, is the fact that global cooling poses a far greater threat to humanity than any form of global warming.

One of the dangers with radical Green Fascism is not just sociopathic, or the irrational arguments made by aspiring think tank fellows like Adam Weinstein, but the obvious intolerance to any other empirical observations, or data which exists outside of the IPCC’s elite clique of political green gravy train grant winners. It’s as if the climatist movement exists in its own vacuum of reality, and repeating only what can be heard in the climatist echo chamber.

Few climatists actually realise that the whole global warming movement was based on computer-modeled projects, or computer guesses – of what could happen in 50 to 200 years time, all based on data inputs which are now highly questionable in light of the Climategate scandal.

Weinstein seems to take umbrage to the critics of Climategate’s chief perpetrator, Dr Michael Mann (photo, left), claiming that Mann has somehow been vindicated because of a Judge’s recent libel ruling against the National Review magazine for comparing Mann’s data fiddling – to Penn State pedophile Jerry Sandusky’s diddling of young boys.

Although he sued and won on the pedophile comparison point, he cannot escape the fact that he’s disgraced himself long ago – Mann, the IPCC’s golden goose, was exposed in the leaked emails during the 2009 Climategate scandal where he and colleagues were caught ‘hiding the decline’ in global temperatures by omitting certain climate data in order to better support his own thesis – an embarrassing graph shaped like a ‘Hockey Stick’.

Mann’s creative data representation claim showed a vertical rise in earth temperature which was the main basis for much of hundreds of billions in wasted public and private funds (and carbon off-set projects which didn’t exist) and the no-holds-barred fear mongering which swept through media, education and porous grey matter of politicians in recent years. Mann played a key role in unleashing the global warming hysteria, but he is only one of many other academics who are paid handsomely to generate research which supports the IPCC’s case for man-made, CO2-induced global warming.

Mann and other promoters of global warming theory, cannot hide from this fact: the earth’s average global temperature has gone flat, and dropped in some cases – over the last 17 years. That’s always been a major problem for radical climatists.

Despite all the billions being poured in by governments to “prove” that anthropogenic global warming exists, there is no actual “consensus” by the world’s scientists like Weinstein and others claim. Any claim like Al Gore’s, that “the science is settled” is simply a poor lie designed to manufacture a consensus – and shut down any debate, or future research that might derail the big green climate gravy train which mas made so many millionaires over the last decade.

Weinstein made a number of incredible claims in his Gawker article, including a sort of ‘death estimate’ from climate change (and try not to laugh):

“Attempts to deceive the public on climate change, and to consequently block any public policy to tackle it, contribute to roughly 150,000 deaths a year already”.

Interesting. If climate change can be construed as anything by extremists like Weinstein, then perhaps his death toll could be inflated, to a few million or more. Why not? He’ll say whatever he wants. Anything goes when you are forming your arguments around a modern day mythology.

The worst culprits of course, are bloggers like Weinstein, who seem to transform into self-styled science PhD’s in a flash just before their copy deadline. The inflated confidence, and the over-reliance on contrived scientific speculation of which green journos themselves know little about the provenance of the claims made – makes for the train wreck which the Reverend Al Gore’s Church of Climatology truly is.

The fact that Gawker’s Weinstein wants to round-up what he refers to as ‘climate deniers’ who probably number in the tens of millions in the US alone, begs the question: where will Mr. Weinstein lock-up all of his new prosecutions – in concentration camps? If they are all guilty of murder, as Weinstein states in his article, then should they all be executed instead? No, maybe not, because that would be genocide, based on political differences (yes, the issue of climate change is 100% political). Hmmm, what does that remind us of?

What passes for intellectual discourse on Gawker these days is anyone’s guess, as Weinstein’s angry undergraduate rant – padded out with lots of colourful statistical  graphs that don’t actually prove that anthropogenic global warming exists, seems like it would be more at home in an old edition of the Weather Underground.

What’s even more shocking than Weinstein’s psychopathy, is if Gawker actually paid him to write his nutty piece.

READ MORE CLIMATE NEWS: 21st Century Wire Climate Files



We are a North American and European-based, grass-roots, independent blog offering geopolitical news and media analysis, working with an array of volunteer contributors who write and help to analyse news and opinion from around the world.


We're covering news you won't necessarily find in the mainstream, and things which regularly confuse career politicians, FOX and CNN watchers... #SundayWire
Here’s what happened when #FeelTheBern hit western college campuses campaigning for #ImWithHer...https://t.co/xXFZvs5UPD @StuartJHooper - 42 mins ago

  • Rogoraeck

    Burn the Witch! Burn the Witch! Burn the Witch! Burn the Witch!
    Ooops Sorry. More CO2!
    Drown the Witch! Drown the Witch! Drown the Witch! Drown the Witch! Drown the Witch!
    Saint Al of the Gore.

    Personally with the Trotskyists warmista I would use a Trotskyist method!
    A bullet to the back of the neck for all Trotskyists!

    • Predrag J. Maranovic

      LOL. No, Suffocate the witch! That’s much more sustainable!

  • Charlie Primero

    Liber = Free. Liberty = Freedom. Liberals believe in Freedom. Liberal means less government. Liberal means less regulation. Liberal is the OPPOSITE of collectivism. Liberal is the OPPOSITE of authoritarianism.

    • Spychiatrist

      Under classical liberalism you would be correct. Today’s liberals are statist authoritarians and nothing less.

      • Charlie Primero

        In other words, they are not liberals.

    • Predrag J. Maranovic

      That’s true Charlie – the meaning of the word has been reversed.

      • Charlie Primero

        Only for propagandists and the uneducated who comply.

        Authoritarians can say the word “Freedom” means slavery, or that a state of warfare is actually peace, but that does not make it so.

        Please do not obey. Please do not comply. Please do not give up.

        • Robert Graf

          Exactly. Quit cooperating with the system.

  • teseeker

    Put all those deniers on an island on the equator! Then they’ll burn up! Thank God, well theirs anyway, that the Navy has developed a method to burn seawater by adding CO2! Now we can SAVE THE WORLD by making more battleships!
    It’s a good thing they killed Stanley Meyer before stealing his technology ‘cuz he’d wonder why they needed to put a pollutant like carbon into it? This tech also turns Coca-Cola into rocket fuel, but they use a nuclear reactor to do it. Hmmm, go figure.

    • Defiant

      I know I speak for MANY of us when I say that I have no idea what your on about…

      • teseeker

        Okay, for those of you that haven’t figured out how to use a search engine yet! Here’s Stanley Meyer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcNFgDuEYUg

        Here’s what happend to him by turning down a $Billion dollar offer for silence and co-operating with our military! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwPL0AhyKUc

        Here’s how the Navy with their ships sitting in open water year round utilizes his technology, so they say,


        Carbon, nitrogen, & other pollutants in petroleum are not needed for combustion. They’re good for dirtying your oil. Engines that burn hydrogen don’t need oil changes. The Navy says they can burn seawater at a cost of $3/gal by adding carbon dioxide (that will help global warming – right?) and will need a nuclear reactor to split the hydrogen from the oxygen efficiently ( right?). LIARS!!!

        Only Lucifer can devise a scheme to tax every human on earth for the air we breath!!! He’s already figured out how to get us to pay him for the plasticized bottled water we drink by poisoning our city tap water! Global warming is currently thruout the solar system! Our earth’s problem is from the ozone layer thinning from all the non-stop military jets chemtrail-spraying us!
        Luci knew we would pollute the earth when he promised CHEAP petroleum for fuel, fertilizers, plastics, and medicine, instead of healthy & better alternatives! He also has destroyed civilization BEFORE with nuclear technology (search glassed deserts)!
        Mankind is so close from total elimination again, not from the thousands of nuclear weapons, but from the over 500 nuclear power plants that will blow when the grid goes down!!! Luci’s got over 500 nuclear weapons in his home-base Israel ready to fire in ALL DIRECTIONS!!!
        If you, Ronald Reagan, would quit waving that American flag out your rear and stop watching old movies, you’d notice we’ve killed a couple million Iraqis, a couple million Afghanis, a few hundred thousand Kosovos, energy-enslaved the world, bankrupted the United States, and sterilized our young men! AND, IF YOU THINK WE CAN KILL MILLIONS OF RUSSIANS, GAME’S OVER!!!
        Don’t expect to make any money on your carbon credits!

        • hp b

          I get it!

      • Muhammad Abbass


      • Afshin Nejat

        You’re one of those sock puppets aren’t you?

  • War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength. Curbing emissions of the gas on which green plants depend is “green”. Submitting to the agendas of plutocrats is liberal and egalitarian.

    • Predrag J. Maranovic

      Amen brother. The ‘green’ activists are doing someone else’s bidding, they are not smart enough to know it, throughout history this has often been the case.

  • Defiant

    Come get me, fat boy!

  • hp b

    Even (gasp!) Jewish climate deniers!!?

    • Billy Singleton

      “Jew” only matters to them when it gains an advantage. The only real Jews are those inwardly, through Jesus Christ.

  • CMRedwood

    Any controversy involving the globalist anthropogenic climate change meme is ALWAYS a great time to bring up the issue of geoengineering / chemtrails thus providing another teaching moment on Hegelian dialectics: problem, reaction, solution. Strangely, only a small percentage of the public understands this. Time for a steeper learning curve.

  • Shouldn’t Adam Weinstein himself be arrested and sued like Michael Mann for LYING to everyone about man-made climate change and then PERSONALLY enriching themselves with the proceeds of their LIES?

  • Linda Sky

    OK, climate change. Why is it that folks on BOTH sides of the issue are totally ignoring the evidence that GEOENGINEERING is the real culprit of extreme climate change, and that is, in fact, man-made? Yes yes we know about the carbon hoax and Agenda 21. But I’d really like to see this issue discussed. Weather is being controlled and weaponized. This issue can not be ignored any longer.

  • bpeters

    jews are such wonderful loving people as they crush your goyim cattle skull

  • Wade Hoffman

    The libs have constructed a religion of authoritarian control no different than any other religion of the past. Global warming is one of their unproved religious dogmas no different than any other dogma of the past, such as the flat-earth doctrine. Now, If one does not conform to their doctrine and dogma, they want to violently persecute you, just as all of the other religions of authoritarian control have done in the past.

  • Rogoraeck

    Weinstein?? Weinstein?? Weinstein??
    We should excise his Weiner??

  • Roddy Pfeiffer

    Why don’t we round up and arrest all the supporters of the apartheid rogue state Israel? That would take care of a lot of these idiots.

  • MacFly1

    Come and get me.

  • John Doe


  • Afshin Nejat

    Of course man-made climate change happens. HAARP, Chemtrails, and who knows what else is probably involved. Technically, he’s not lying about that in itself, or that it causes a lot of deaths.

  • Italics Mine

    No, Virginia, you can’t destroy everyone that disagreeth with thee.

  • Peter Wood

    I was in high school in the 70’s and being a teen I suppose I was drinking the koolaide when I thought I was being an independent thinker. At that time the climate was an “issue” and we were concerned of a new “ice age”. It was coming REAL soon and man was responsible for it. we were going to be living under glaciers, if we lived, because of man. 30 some odd years later that koolaide has left my system and if I want to start drinking it again I am gonna need some ice.
    In other words to Adam Weinstein and ESPECIALLY ALGORE, WAH WAH WAH!!!!
    You are both foolish and you want to make a buck off of a scare tactic. I hope that you’re proud of yourselfs. At least we know who the koolaide mixers are don’t we?

  • Laughter Man

    Oh shit I thought that was Mark Levin dancing in the money, it’s Ben Bernanke lol

  • Asok Asus

    Clearly Adam Weinstein is completely ignorant of the history of science. They locked up Galileo for denying what the 99% “consensus” of existing “scientists” had to say about the fundamental “settled science” of astronomy that the Sun rotated around the Earth, but the Earth continued to rotate around the sun anyway.

    A few of the other scientists who correctly bucked the 99% consensus and thereby revolutionized their respective sciences were, Louis Pasteur, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Alfred Wegener, Antoine Lavoisier, Robert T. Bakker, and Robin Warren and Barry J. Marshall. Fortunately for humanity, though, psychotic mass murders like Adam Weinstein weren’t put in charge of slaughtering scientific heretics during those times.

    Adam Weinstein should try reading “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” by Thomas Kuhn and he MIGHT realize that the history of science is nothing BUT the 99% consensus of WRONG scientists being overturned by the 1% minority with truth on their side.