Facebook Twitter Google+ Shout YouTube SoundCloud RSS
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

Why Washington DC Turns Its Back on Saudi Brutality – and Blames Everything on Iran

21st Century Wire says…

In the New American Century, the concept of ‘human rights’ has become a relative concept.

The recent Saudi execution of the Shi’ite cleric and political activist Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr served as a reminder that the political establishment in Washington DC, and its media counterparts, may wax lyrical about ‘human rights,’ but at the end of the day its guiding principle is Vladimir Lenin’s who, whom dictum.

1-Nimr-al-Nimr
PROVOCATION: Saudi’s planned execution of Shi’ite cleric has become the new lightning rod for conflict in the region.

Sheikh al-Nimr was accused by the Saudi government of inciting terrorism and encouraging sedition. The cleric was a firebrand for sure and he made no qualms about expressing his loathing of the Saudi-Wahhabi regime that has oppressed the Shi’ites of the Arabian peninsula for over a century, his actual “crimes” were not waging a violent campaign against the government, but daring to call for an end to the vicious institutional discrimination of Shi’ites and demanding they be treated as equal to their Sunni fellow citizens. It should be noted that the Saudis encouraged violence and terrorism among Sunnis in Libya and Syria during the advent of the so-called Arab Spring, but ruthlessly suppressed al-Nimr and other Saudi Shi’ites seeking political and social reforms at the same time. This will also the case with the brutal Saudi-backed quelling of Shi’ite protests in nearby Bahrain over the past 4 years.

That the Wahhabi establishment in Saudi Arabia hated and feared Sheikh al-Nimr and would not stand for his challenging their power comes as no surprise, the Saudi government is no friend of its resident dissidents and a pathological hatred of Shi’ites is firmly engrained in the government – sponsored Wahhabi sect’s theological outlook. So in light of that, the actions of the Saudis is hardly surprising.

What is perhaps, at least superficially, more surprising is the response of American politicians…

Pentagon Channel as Pentagon Press Secretary Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby briefs reporters in the Pentagon Press Briefing Room March 27, 2014. Kirby outlined objectives of Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel's trip to Asia next week and as well took questions regarding the ongoing crisis in the Ukraine and search efforts for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370. DoD Photo by Glenn Fawcett (Released)
Former Pentagon Press Secretary Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby briefs reporters (Image Source: WikiCommons)

‘Optics’ Not Ethics

At the U.S. State Department, John Kirby offered up only that the White House had some vague “concern” about human rights, and refused to make a more decisive condemnation, despite the fact the State Department routinely denounces other governments for far less.

Leading Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said the execution raises “serious questions,” though she never explained what these questions were, nor did she make a direct condemnation. One might wonder if Hillary’s muted response would have anything to do with the many millions of dollars in donations made to her globalist war chest, the Clinton Foundation by the Saudis.

Among the neoconservative pundit class, as outlined by the journalist Jim Lobe, the execution of al-Nimr was dismissed as a ‘minor’ item, or worse, outright defended, on the (false) pretext that the cleric was a ‘Iranian agent of influence’ (and therefore deserving of his fate). Lobe offers this quote from FOX News pundit and Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer defending the Saudis, and taking a swipe at Obama for being insufficiently bellicose with Iran:

“Just last week the U.S. responded to the firing of the missiles, illegal firing of the nuclear-capable missiles by Iran by threatening trivial sanctions and then actually canceling, or postponing the sanctions, when the Iran protested and said they would increase their production of missiles. In other words, the U.S. would not even respond to an open provocation on the missile issue, and what they read is complete abandonment. They are now on their own, and then they’re not going to have to face the Iranians and their allies on their own. And if that means they have to execute a Shiite who is an insurrectionist in their country, he’s got to be executed.”

Krauthammer would have us believe that history started five minutes ago, and that someone like al-Nimr only exists because of the sinister machinations of Tehran’s ayatollahs, abetted by Obama’s “strategy of retreat.” This is the narrative promoted by the neocons and their fellow travelers in the American media, including an increasing number of what amount to shills on the Saudi payroll.

Another example of this anti-Iranian narrative being standardized is to be found in an interview Congressman Ed Royce (R), chair of the Congressional Committee on Foreign Affairs, gave to CNN in which he dissembled about the al-Nimr execution, instead blaming Iran and going as far to state that Saudis aggressive anti-Shi’ite policies is justified because of the supposed presence of the Iranian military in neighboring Yemen, an even more extreme and dishonest variation of the since debunked conspiracy theory that Iran is the secret hand behind the Houthi militia that ousted the Yemeni president previously installed by the Americans and the Saudis. In a most ridiculous case, Royce accuses Iran of trying to overthrow Middle Eastern regimes, which is rich coming from a man who has ardently supported the American “regime change” wars in Iraq and Libya.

Despite all the lofty rhetoric from Washington about human rights, democracy, and freedom for minorities, the response to the beheading of Sheikh al-Nimr are a reminder these things are merely rhetorical devices to undermine foreign governments that are insufficiently compliant toward Washington – as human rights concerns are dismissed for those regimes that are willing to do Washington’s bidding, and who have cash to throw around to politicians, think tanks and media outlets.

Make no mistake: the execution of Sheikh al-Nimr didn’t ‘just happen’ as per usual – it was planned, as were the reactions that we are currently witnessing on our TV screens. This event was designed to trigger a chain reaction of power-politics and forced-sectarian strife in the region – just as the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand did in 1914.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia continues to prosecute one of the most brutal wars ever seen in Yemen (and hardly a tear from President Obama).

For Washington, all that matters now is who, and whom.

READ MORE SAUDI NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Saudi Files



facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblr


  • John C Carleton

    Because Saudi is doing what the beings behind the curtain wants done, just like the minions from Sodom and Gomorra on the Potomac. They work for the same entity.

  • WeAreYourGods

    Looks like the Saudis are ready to start up a regional war to drive oil prices back up. Funding every Sunni terror group in the world just isn’t enough.

  • Hp B

    Here’$ my gue$$ why.

  • Ali Hussain

    America, Britain, France and others who support Saudi regime supports terrorism and the worse thing is Saudi regime uses fake Islam to spread their terror worldwide. Have you seen the Saudi flag? written on it “There is no god but God and Mohammed is his messenger and what’s under the writings, symbol of sword” thats not the message nor the image of Islam… Shame on Saudis and whoever supports them. May they all burn in Hell for eternity.. Ameen.. Keep your friend close keep your enemy closer.. PEACE

  • Herbert Dorsey

    Briton gets the blame for creating Wahhabis and placing the House of Saud into power in Arabia. This is well documented in David Livingstone’s book “Terrorism and the Illuminati” . This was part of Briton’s divide and rule policy. The Sauds were originally bandits in Arabia and thus were enemies of the Ottoman Turks. Abdul Wahhab was a British agent who was paid to start the fundamentalist Wahhabi religious movement, which later declared a jihad against the Ottoman Turks. Both were allies of the British and along with Laurence of Arabia, were to finally able to separate Arabia from the Ottoman Turks.

  • RedTickAlert

    Good article and here is my view on the matter.

    Something will happen and I reckon quite soon. Iran will be seen as the bad guys (although they did sweet FA), leading to new sanctions on them and then blah blah – Russia gets involved and then somehow China….also bad guys.

    Just listen / watch that video – these US politicians are mad, I mean mad as hatters. If you can cut out the BS, it was not a warning, it was a foreign policy decision already taken…it must be already planned.

    The Yanks think they are invincible militarily, they are not, but maybe more importantly are people that agree with me and there are thousands a day suddenly waking up, reading sites like this and going – “doh, never thought of it like that” and turning on or against, or even doubting the propaganda BS that is fed to us on daily basis.

    However powerful these pricks think they are, once the people unite and revolt, w may loose a battle BUT WE SHALL WIN THE WAR.

    I blame Putin …….. just thought I would through that in