Facebook Twitter Google+ Shout YouTube SoundCloud RSS

Crystal Clear: Washington’s War on Whistleblowing is Un-American

21st Century Wire says…

1-Whistleblowers-NSA-CIA
Let’s get one thing straight: those in Washington who work to punish and imprison government employees for exposing unethical, and highly illegal activities – are not only operating outside of social norms, they are actively covering up criminal acts and policies. 

Those who target whistleblowers in government and in media, are not doing so as patriots, they are doing so on behalf of a secretive shadow executive. This needs to stop, if the United States is to salvage any remnants of credibility – not only in the eyes of international onlookers, but in the eyes of Americans at home. 

There’s been much to do about NSA whistelblower Ed Snowden and Bradley (Chelsea) Manning, but the political persecution of General James Cartwright (photo, left) is perhaps the most telling of this year’s cases. Cartwright spoke to the press about an dubious CIA-Israel operation targeting civilian nuclear power facilities which put millions of lives at risk. Others have done the same and paid a heavy price at the hands of cowardly Mandarins in Washington DC. 

Crime is an industry in Washington, and profits are generated from practices and policies that are clearly wrong and counterproductive in terms of the national interest. Washington’s criminal elements are embedded in the White House, various Senate and House “oversight” committees (whose job is to oversee criminal practices), the CIA and in the Pentagon. Those who target whistleblowers are only doing so to cover-up crimes by individuals, institutions and the mobs who interact with these parties.

These are merely a few examples of what is wrong with the secretive mentality…
.

Someone Would Have Talked? Someone Would Be Crazy

.
Russ Baker
Who What Why

There is a war on whistleblowing.

Would covert operatives whose work involves subverting democratic governments abroad—including violent coups such as the one that brought down Chilean President Salvador Allende in 1973—hesitate when ordered to participate in comparable activities at home?

We’re constantly told that no such thing could happen in the good ole USA (certainly not in the deaths of JFK, RFK, MLK, for example), if for no other reason than that it is impossible to keep such plots secret.

Or, in the common parlance: “Someone would have talked.”

The logic goes: since no one has come forward to describe their role in such plots, therefore no plot has existed.

In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. People are coming forward all the time to provide, if not the whole story, crucial bits and pieces that together would lead us to awareness of a variety of covert doings, some clearly nefarious. For example, scores, perhaps hundreds of credible eyewitnesses have cast doubt on the official “lone kook” scenario that is a staple of every domestic assassination.

But these whistleblowers are quickly discredited, suppressed, or worse. From time to time people even come out of the national security establishment to testify to such wrongdoing, but they almost always pay a heavy price –which of course discourages others from bearing witness.

How many remember the story of Philip Agee? Phil was a loyal American who served in the Central Intelligence Agency abroad. Eventually, he could no longer stomach the ugly work he and colleagues were doing to subvert the affairs of other countries, and he became a critic and a fugitive. You can read about his hair-raising adventures as the might of the US government came down upon him wherever he went, in his book On the Run.  

The Waterboard Whisperer

In the years since, there have been numerous other examples of “someone” who did talk, only to suffer a variety of unpleasant circumstances. The most recent case is that of former CIA officer John Kiriakou, who faces up to 45 years in prison for statements he has made.

Kiriakou first attracted the Agency’s ire when, in 2007, the ex-agent told ABC News that while he believed that waterboarding could be effective, it was morally the wrong thing to do. He was quickly ousted from his job as a security risk analyst for the accounting firm Deloitte.

He later, the government charges, spoke to journalists who were seeking confirmation of the identity of agency personnel involved with the controversial interrogation program that used methods tantamount to torture. Kiriakou faces four counts related to leaking classified information, each carrying a penalty of ten years imprisonment.

He is also accused of having told the CIA that material in a book he was writing  would “fictionalize” a high-tech CIA scanning device known as a “magic box” while in fact he went ahead to describe it accurately. The charge of making false statements could earn him an additional five years imprisonment.

The bottom line here is that public servants can go to jail for trying to inform the public about the truth of what their government does—and, bizarrely, for lying to the government by falsely promising to lie about government secrets while actually telling the truth about what they had seen from the inside.

As for “someone would have talked”……baloney. Almost nobody talks. And for good reason. Just ask John Kiriakou.

READ MORE ON COVER-UPS AT: 21st Century Wire

21wire

21wire

We are a North American and European-based, grass-roots, independent blog offering geopolitical news and media analysis, working with an array of volunteer contributors who write and help to analyse news and opinion from around the world.
21wire

@21WIRE

Independent journalist trying to keep it real in an epoch of great mainstream deception... #SundayWire
RT @RussiaConnects: It goes well beyond outrageous satire that western elites who have virtually destroyed the Middle East should point at… - 11 hours ago
21wire