Facebook Twitter Google+ Shout YouTube SoundCloud RSS

Flight MH370 Found? Not Quite – Now the Real Whitewash Begins.

Patrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire

After nearly one month of turning up absolutely nothing, suddenly the public are being told that the case of missing Malaysian airliner MH370 has been solved, well, sort of…

It was a search and rescue operation on an unprecedented scale, combing through over 30,000 nautical miles, involving 60 ships and 50 aircraft – all in an effort to find one missing Boeing 777 which is said to have set off from Kula Lumpur to Beijing on March 8, 2014, only to disappear into thin air, without a trace.

1-Malaysia_Airlines-Illustration(not actual)
IMAGE: Photo-illustration of a Malaysian Airlines Flight.

The World’s Biggest Fishing Trip Begins

This week Malaysian authorities made the dramatic announcement that they had finally “found” the aircraft, without any “debris sighting” . On cue, global mainstream media outlets began running continuous coverage on Monday March 24th of this week, showing footage of men looking out the window of Royal Australian Air Force P-3, looking rather intensely at a trail of smoke hanging over the water, but failed to tell viewers in many instances – that this was merely a “smoke marker placed there”, no doubt for the cameras.

This,we are told, is meant to draw a line under the story in a communal ‘move on’ moment.

The Malaysian prime minister boldly announced that analysis of satellite data concludes “beyond a doubt” that the plane had in fact gone down in the southern Indian Ocean 2,500 kilometers (1,500) west of Perth, Australia.

A few object were said to be found, but these were not shown on TV or to media. “Objects could be picked up in a few hours”, Malaysia’s transport minister said, while Australian PM Tony Abbott said, “One object was circular and grey or green, and the other rectangular and orange – but it could be flotsham“. In reality, nothing.

What is clear now – is that there is still no evidence of a Being 777 crash-landing there, and that this latest PR campaign is one big fishing trip.

Don’t be surprised if this same plane turns up halfway across the world at a later date – involved in a major ‘global crisis’, or false flag event.

Here where things get dicey: this suddenly incredible “debris sighting” has been based on information from one private British telecoms firm, Inmarsat, who run a fleet of 30 satellites globally overlapping with systems run by US-based Raytheon. Inmarsat claim to have come to their conclusion based on data “relayed between the plane and ground station by satellite”. Inmarsat then sent its computer findings on Friday to the UK Air Accident Investigation Branch based in Aldershot, Hampshire, who spent one day “going over the figures” before sending it to the Malaysian authorities.

Of all the likely destinations for the missing flight, it seems incredible that would fly for 3 or more hours south, only to ditch the plane in the water miles from any land mass. This latest conclusion is based almost solely on computer modeled data – supplied by Inmarsat, and as yet, no physical proof that Flight MH370 has actually crashed at the location they are claiming it did.

By contrast, an actual eyewitness sighting was reported the morning of the crash, but was more or less ignored by all governments and mainstream media outlets. Haveeru local news previously confirmed that, “Residents of the remote Maldives island of Kuda Huvadhoo in Dhaal Atoll have reported seeing a “low flying jumbo jet” on the morning of the disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.” That report continues:

“Eyewitnesses from the Kuda Huvadhoo concurred that the aeroplane was travelling North to South-East, towards the Southern tip of the Maldives – Addu. They also noted the incredibly loud noise that the flight made when it flew over the island.

“I’ve never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We’ve seen seaplanes, but I’m sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly,” said an eyewitness.

“It’s not just me either, several other residents have reported seeing the exact same thing. Some people got out of their houses to see what was causing the tremendous noise too.”

Coincidentally, The Maldives Islands are more or less along a direct flight path to the US and British island military base at Diego Garcia. Make of that what you will, but you cannot discount this in connection to reports that one of the MH370 pilots has Diego Garcia plotted on his own home flight simulator.

Confusion was stirred up even more after retired United States Air Force Lieutenant General, Thomas G. McInerney, turned up on a FOX News program hosted by Mike Huckaby, proceeding to infer that the US has known all along where the plane had traveled, and that the missing Boeing 777 was already in Central Asia. Watch:

Although McInerney went on to reinforce the White House myth that Osama bin Laden was killed in 2011 at his compound in Pakistan, you can’t help but wonder why he was sent onto FOX at the very time that this latest “discovery” has happened. Bill Stills concluded his commentary by warning the this plane may likely end up being be used for some US-sponsored flase flag, or terrorist act in the future.

Mainstream media is now being flooded with reports of “grieving families” which the public have only now been given access to, and western media talking points are focusing on victims’ families blaming the Malaysian government for its incompetence in conducting the search and that somehow ‘blood is now on the Malaysian governments’ hands’.

21WIRE detailed some suspicions regarding the passenger lists and talk of key Freescale (Austin, TX based) employees being on the plane, as well as the technical parameters regarding the planes transponder systems and radar detection. In the end, for the government anyway, the whole story has relied exclusively on technical and computer satellite specs in order to illustrate a timeline and possible locations for the missing flight.

MEDIA DRAMA: The grieving families and the all important ‘blame game’.

The blame game that has ensued following Malaysia’s ‘endorsement’ of the British location data (which is still a guess) and Malaysia is now accusing Inmarsat of ‘sitting on the information for 10 days’, which means that a convenient media side-show has now opened up to distract from actually finding the plane. Telegraph said it today:

“The AAIB, working with Inmarsat, provided the only credible information on the Malaysia Airlines flight’s whereabouts, but a series of delays meant ten crucial days were lost before search teams began looking in the southern Indian Ocean, where it now seems certain the aircraft went down.”

Regardless of what is being said and what theories are being kicked around, one can conclude, once again, that the official story of Malaysian Flight MH370 is a complete whitewash already.

Isn’t it funny how the biggest plane hunt in human history – over in Asia, is swiftly closed down by a single British company and a British government aviation agency?

Who is Inmarsat?

Inmarsat Plc is a major player in government, military, aviation satellite markets, partners with the likes of Honeywell, and refers to itself as “the world’s leading provider of mobile satcoms” with its IsatPhone range, and covers a wide range of global contracts, most notably its satellite communications for “coalition military forces” deployed on missions in Iraq, Afghanistan and other locations, and has also been awarded a FEMA contract to continue providing Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) in the US. Reuters explains, “Under this contract, FEMA will use Inmarsat satellite services to provide reliable, mission-critical communications between supporting personnel in the event of a disaster. In emergency situations, it is essential that first responders are able to communicate immediately not only among themselves, but also with their leadership through respective command and operational centers.”

According to a 2011 interview with London’s City AM: “Inmarsat offers mobile connectivity solutions for anything from a single yacht travelling the Pacific to the thousands of US troops stationed in Afghanistan. It is a FTSE 100 powerhouse, but one which rarely makes headlines… This is despite it providing a huge proportion of the connectivity during the recent clashes in the Middle East, allowing journalists, protesters and aid workers to spread news about the fall of generation-old governments and the brutal clashes in Libya.”

In March 2012, Al-Jazeera Beirut correspondent Ali Hashim along with two others, resigned over objections over Qatar’s pro-US and UK foreign policy slanted reporting on the conflict, and revealed that Al-Jazeera spent $50,000 for smuggling phones and satellite communication tools to Syria’s rebels. Did Inmarsat provide the sat phones al Jazeera gave to Syrian ‘Rebels’, aiding foreign insurgents in Syria in coordinating terrorist attacks inside that country? Good question. Only a few firms would be positioned to deliver that service, and Inmarsat, according to their own admission anyway, would be at the top of the list.

In Sept 2013, Inmarsat announced further inroads into the aviation industry, providing “GSM and Internet services to airlines and their passengers”. Reuters reported, “Thales SA announced that it has signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that would include the Company as a partner in marketing Inmarsat PLC’s connectivity solutions to the commercial aviation market. Under the MOA, SwiftBroadband and GX Aviation are the primary and preferred satellite services for Thales SA’s TopSeries IFEC system…. Financial terms were not disclosed.”

In June 2013, Inmarsat bid alongside the Carlyle Group LP and the Blackstone Group LP for control over Singapore Telecommunications Ltd’s Australian satellite unit. Reuters reported, “SingTel, Southeast Asia’s telecom operator, values the satellite business of its Australian unit Optus at more than AUD2 billion ($1.9 billion), and has put it on sale as it battles tepid growth in its key markets of Singapore and Australia. Inmarsat PLC, Blackstone Group LP and Carlyle Group LP are among the other suitors to submit bids ahead of the deadline. Blackstone, Carlyle, KKR, Intelsat, SES and SingTel declined comment.”

It also has business agreements with Malaysian shipping conglomerate MISC Berhad (MISC), signing its first big deal covering 46 of its vessels, “comprised of chemical and LNG tankers, for Inmarsat’s XpressLink service”.

Officially, Boeing 777 Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 is still missing…

More to come on this story – so stay tuned to 21WIRE

READ MORE MH370 NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire MH370 Files




We are a North American and European-based, grass-roots, independent blog offering geopolitical news and media analysis, working with an array of volunteer contributors who write and help to analyse news and opinion from around the world.


We're covering news you won't necessarily find in the mainstream, and things which regularly confuse career politicians, FOX and CNN watchers... #SundayWire
Setting straight lies + deception of US/UK/French funded media campaigns... https://t.co/BPGitspHWC @VanessaBeeley #WhiteHelmets - 2 hours ago

  • Rogoraeck

    Actually. Quote:

    Posted March 24, Updated March 25

    UPDATE: Nothing has changed overnight regarding what is below.
    This panned out. The plane flew from Miami un announced and without
    identification or beacon and was stopped by the Dutch Air Force before
    reaching the nuclear Summit. The fact it originated in the U.S. and
    flew in U.S. territorial airspace for at least 300 miles unidentified
    without getting intercepted is all the more damning. The fact it even
    got into European airspace is damning as well, the first line of defense
    let it pass. I have only one comment – logic needs to prevail in this,
    we won’t get the truth out of the MSM with anything and the proof is
    living in Sandy hook, flying into the world trade center and watching
    Bat Man.

    UPDATE: My final conclusion: what I think went down was they
    tried a little experiment, and if they got away with it the plane would
    have been crashed in the name of Iran or arabs. If any problems arose,
    the cover story was to go into full effect from the highest levels.
    THAT is what I think happened, and we got damn lucky.

    Original post:

    Though the Dutch state no foul play was involved, and claimed it was a
    “cargo jet”, it’s not every day that a 777 airplane flies unidentified
    straight towards a nuclear summit where all the world’s leaders (sans
    Israel’s) are. I am going to say it like it 99.9999% likely is – THEY

    BINGO, GREAT JOB EVERYONE, THIS TIME WE NAILED IT, and if that link quits supporting what is written here, I will fix it with a capture of the original.

    And to the Dutch: Great job finding flight 370! Remove whatever mock ups
    were installed to hide what it was and return it to Malaysia airlines.
    Then start asking the pilots (if there were any) serious questions about
    where the passengers are.

    Simple law of probability nails the intercepted jet as flight 370. Out
    of hundreds of thousands if not millions of flights annually, jumbo jets
    flying with their transponders off to avoid identification virtually
    never happens even once a year globally, let alone towards a nuclear
    summit where all the world’s leaders (sans Israel’s) are and the fact
    this was a 777, the same plane that is now missing, CINCHES IT.

    They can bag whatever spin they put on this and throw it straight in the
    trash, how many times have you heard of the Air Force being scrambled
    to intercept an unidentified jumbo jet, let alone the Dutch air force?

    Malaysia Airlines, your plane is found. Demand it back, remove
    whatever mock ups were installed to hide what it was, make them pay to
    repaint it, service it, and put it right back in your fleet and if they
    played switcheroo you now know who has it.

    The story is that this was a cargo plane. Interesting, because the Jews
    now own Fedex, DHL, UPS and a majority of other carriers, and only high
    class carriers will fly 777 jets. If this jet ends up belonging to
    anyone’s military, that’s equally bad. If you want to know who the
    enemy is, just look to see who ends up being identified as the owner of
    this “cargo plane” and if it ends up being Arabs, THAT would also be a
    set up.

    The original article posted by the Dutch has been preserved. This
    cannot be silenced, if anyone tries I will put the original right back
    online in the form of a mailable Jpeg.

    • Tony Binca

      Yes! From jimstonefreelance.com. thanks for posting this. This is the most likely explanation since Israel pulled all it’s people out of the summit and indeed from all their embassies worldwide. Just because this was foiled doesn’t mean they don’t have something else up their sleeve, but it is great news that a horrible terrorist attack was thwarted. My question is, where are the passengers? All liquidated? Probably, and that is just sick.

      • Pravda01

        None sense Boeing has problems with the 787, 747 long body and the 777. Lufthansa was warned today of faulty software which could lead to transponder and engines problems.

        So this time it is not the Zionist (I don’t like them either) but it is Boeing’s stupidity. Watch the AF447 – Airbus documentary and you will get more clues – what Boeing is hiding. Do you think that Airbus/Boeing using different procedures? You are wrong.

      • Predrag J. Maranovic

        Seriously? LOL. Disinfo agents are everywhere. Cloud the picture. That’s the assignment.

    • Ryan

      The company according to CNN is LAN Cargo. On Wikipedia it states they have 3 boeing 777F planes (the freight variant of the 777) in their fleet which was updated January 2014. Today looking at the LAN Cargo website they have 4 777F planes. Just a bit of information.

    • Predrag J. Maranovic

      Bullshit story – MH370 did not try a suicide flight to Nuclear Summit. The story is pap from a ridiculous disinfo site.

      Someone is smoking too much pot.

    • Mike

      Still amazes me….

      Here we are in the 21st century, sending rockets to the moon, space exploration, i-pads and state of the art technology…and we still switch off a transponder with a little dial placed within reach in a cockpit instead of controlling this from the ground /or by air traffic control, a Boeing 777 carrying 239 passengers lives at risk and no cameras in the cockpit.

      We are either sick or very stupid for being so trusting.

    • Melissa Everton

      These ridiculous conspiracy theories which are not based on the evidence just serve to turn people off a plausible conspiracy theory based on the evidence.

      Consider the only sighting of the actual aircraft in the Maldives, and its timing, the fuel load on board, and the only claim of responsibility, and connect the dots. I think it likely the aircraft was hijacked as part of a larger struggle between Uyghur nationalists and the Chinese Communist Party, and was flown evasively to Diego Garcia in order to ensure a US shoot down of a plane full of Chinese citizens. This implies a remarkable high level conspiracy to deny the terrorists of a victory, made possible by the remoteness of Diego Garcia.


  • W0X0F

    If you flip the Imarsat calculation to the northerly route approx 40n 87e it was in western china, the Uyghur desert? Refueling?

  • elderlyfox


    WHY was the Maldives sighting termed false when fishermen on remote islands, with no knowledge of the Malaysia-jack even identified the plane’s colors? Why do Ms refuse to give cargo details? If it were only punishment for M, then they could have dumped the plane in The Indian O, without taking it to 45,000ft after the turn to kill all passengers. One ping reported by a Brit? Brits never tell lies. Iraq, Libya, Princess Di, London 7/7 bombings etc..

    • Mike

      Still amazes me….

      Here we are in the 21st century, sending rockets to the moon, space exploration, i-pads and state of the art technology…and we still switch off a transponder with a little dial placed within reach in a cockpit instead of controlling this from the ground /or by air traffic control, a Boeing 777 carrying 239 passengers lives at risk and no cameras in the cockpit.

      We are either sick or very stupid for being so trusting.

  • lifeofliberty

    Speculating on what happened to the flight is rather stupid from armchair “experts”. The millions of dollars spent on the search do indicate reasonable belief that the plane could have gone down at sea. Until actual facts are known, conjecture and speculation just makes authors like this look very stupid.

    • Pravda01

      The actually only know that the plane has disappeared, but they don’t know where. What Boeing knows is what is in the maintenance records ‘EVERY’ plane sends out. Why would Boeing warn Lufthansa today of faulty software?

      I would not fly a Boeing plane made in the last 5 years!!!

    • GlargodSr

      IMO, officiales declared the flight “lost at sea” for financial reason. SAR operations are extremely costly.

      They wanted to save face and stop wasting cash… GREEDY

    • Amanda Kramer

      Here are some facts. The way those planes are built, if they hit the ocean, there would be tens of thousands of objects floating on the water for probably hundreds of miles..

      We see nothing.. it did NOT crash in the ocean anywhere.

  • Pravda01

    Boeing cover up! Period.

  • cimmo

    Wrong photo near head of story.

    If you cannot get such a simple thing as the type of aircraft correct, what trust should I give you about the article itself?

    • Predrag J. Maranovic

      Umm, err, if you look at the photo at top of article – if your brain is functioning, you can see it’s a photo illustration – not a documentary image.

      Nice try – go back to gov troll school please. LOL.

      Amateur hour in here.

      • cimmo

        I don’t care if it is a photo, photo illustration or kid’s finger painting.

        It is clearly an Airbus A380. Not a Boeing 777.

        There are quite probably thousands of suitable images of a Boeing 777 with MAS titles that could have been used – but someone doesn’t know jack sh!t about aircraft.

        Can YOU tell the difference between an A380 and a B777?

        Now, go troll yourself – very vigorously.

        • Predrag J. Maranovic

          LOL. Grow up. Stop looking at the pretty pictures, and talk about the article. Grow up.

        • Predrag J. Maranovic

          “A mind is a terrible thing to waste”…

  • GlargodSr

    in the first picture of this article, there are 4 engines on the plane. a 777 has 2. I wouldn’t want this type of error to be a testament to the article’s content.

    • Predrag J. Maranovic

      You’re an idiot. That’s not a documentary photo, it’s an illustration.

      Paid gov trolls are hanging out in here too much.

      Go to Sorcha Faal and have fun there.

      • cimmo

        Can YOU tell the difference between an A380 and a B777?

        Why do you think it does not matter?

        • Predrag J. Maranovic

          What matters is the content of the article -not the pretty pictures, and especially not photo illustration of the plane at top.

          If you are illiterate, that’s fair enough, but if can read, let’s pretend to be adults and discuss the article itself.

          How much does the NSA pay its trolls per hour?

          • cimmo

            “What matters is the content of the article”
            Yes, but as I said in my first comment:

            “If you cannot get such a simple thing as the type of aircraft correct, what trust should I give you about the article itself?”

            Whoever wrote or edited this piece had a simple choice of illustrations to use. They chose incorrectly, so how do I know further errors are not in the article?

            Answer – I am far more likely to be more skeptical about the content.

            “If you are illiterate, that’s fair enough, but if can read, let’s…”
            Oh, the irony.

            “How much does the NSA pay its trolls per hour?”
            For someone supporting the apollohoax nonsense, please don’t expect anything you say to be taken seriously by me at all.

      • GlargodSr

        I’m not sure how my comment would qualify me as a troll, but I can tell that your negative comment, which is empty and your immature name calling, meant to put me down, places you in the shadow of a troll at the very least.

        Seriously, with rhetorics like yours, TPTB do not need trolls, for your little concept of reality is doing their work for free.

        My point, and I stand by it, is how can one put much credibility into a news report or blog or what have you if the author cannot get a simple thing such a photo correct.

        As a matter of fact, CNN and all other MSM use incorrect and fraudulent pictures and footage all the time; which cost them what little credibility they had in the eyes of those who pay attention.

        • Predrag J. Maranovic

          How is the image above “fraudulent” when it says below it:

          ‘IMAGE: Photo-illustration of a Malaysian Airlines Flight.

          Are you guys in high school or something?

          This is starting to get boring. Look, most people have seen the NSA and GCHQ and Pentagon handbooks on troll training, they are all over the net, and what you’re attempting to do – to discredit the written content over an issue which does not exist (photo is an illustration, any idiot can see that) – is govt troll playbook.

          It’s doesn’t work anymore. You should go to Infowars.com , plenty of action there. Be sure to clock out when you’re done and fill in the overtime sheet. LOL.

          • GlargodSr

            It is apparent to me that the whole point of credibility is going at 35,000 ft and 520 knots over your little head

            peace out little man

          • Mike

            Still amazes me….oh boy!

            Here we are in the 21st century, sending rockets to the moon, space exploration, i-pads and state of the art technology…and we still switch off a transponder with a little dial placed within reach in a cockpit instead of controlling this from the ground /or by air traffic control, a Boeing 777 carrying 239 passengers lives at risk and no cameras in the cockpit.

            We are either sick or very stupid for being so trusting.

  • Adam Evenson

    Get accustomed to two things: governments always lie to whatever degree is considered “necessary” for government purposes, and governments have always committed a large percentage of the crimes that happen in the world and then commit their best efforts (and those of the public) to cover up the “Whodunnit” evidence. Indeed, the whole story of humankind’s self-devastation, since the first human being extruded from the dust of the earth, may be summed up in a single, six-letter word: hubris. It’s the singular item responsible for about 99.99999% of the world’s woes at any time in history. The remaining .000001% of woes is no doubt accounted for by the reality of human babies that can’t commit any woes for being yet too young to be routed and herded into the lure and siren song of the way of hubris that ensnares the more experienced and gullible.

  • Carl Jones

    “What is clear now – is that there is still no evidence of a Being 777 crash-landing there”…but there is hard evidence that MH370 did not crash. This plane was fitted with a distress buoy and it has not activated, so it did not crash.

  • Nalliah Thayabharan

    The orbit of the INMARSAT satellite (inclined at 1.66° to the equator)
    which leads to a latitude-dependent Doppler shift with a 24 hour period,
    the velocity and orientation of the plane (the moving platform Doppler
    shift is a function of position, speed and heading), and the short-term
    stability of the carrier frequency from the plane’s transmitter,
    including considering possible variations in the power supply voltage.
    There will be a cluster of velocity-dependent positional solutions for
    each ping, which can be evaluated for a unique consistent solution for a
    plane’s route, if one exists. If the transmitted frequency varies at
    source and/or if the plane’s route and speed varied erratically then
    there may be no unique solution.