21st Century Wire
The exact circumstances of the crash remain a subject of much debate, but we have learned in recent weeks after the publication of Alan Power’s The Princess Diana Conspiracy, of the existence of an SAS assassination unit known as ‘The Increment’ which worked – or works, under the orders of MI6 and that the head of the this unit was in Paris the night Diana died.
(INFOGRAPHIC: Daily Mail)
Although one might feel squeamish doing so, one could also speculate about what other operations ‘The Increment’ has been up to in recent years, but we do know that there were plans to assassinate former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic in a car, in a tunnel, using a ‘lamping unit’ to dazzle the driver and cause a crash. And now in the last few days, an SAS soldier has gone on record to say Diana was killed in this way – in a crash, but not an accident.
The revelation was reported today in the Daily Mail, where the man speaking, ’Soldier N’, made the astonishing allegations to his wife after taking Prince William on his advanced driving course in 2008.
“The wife reportedly claimed her husband had told her the ‘hit’ had been instructed by individuals in the royal inner circle because they disapproved of Diana’s relationship with Fayed.
The forthcoming investigation will probe claims today from a key source in the UK security industry that GCHQ was remotely taping Diana and Dodi up until the moment of the crash.
The source told the Sunday Express the controversial couple had their phones tapped.”
IMAGE: Mohammed Al Fayed has been relentless in his pursuit of the facts surrounding his son and Diana’s death.
So there you have it. In their own words, The Sovereign appears to be ‘above the law’ and civil and criminal proceedings cannot be taken against her, but what of her husband, or son and heir, who Diana herself said in her hand written note, was planning an accident in her car. This raises some very interesting lines of inquiry, and issues regarding constitutional law in Britain.
These individuals are the numbers two and three in the order of precedence, so are they in fact “above” any law enforcement officer or elected official ?
Perhaps they too consider themselves to be above the law. Perhaps they are.