Another Out-Of-Court Bailout? McAlpine to seek larger ITV payout, possibly 500K

Of course, the idea that he would get any more than £250k in court is highly dubious since he was never even named and you couldn’t even read the THIS MORNING printed capitals on the back of the card.

Very few who did have sympathy for mcalpine do now.

This is about turning the attention away from child abuse and sowing doubt about the victims.

He won`t sue Icke, because Icke knows alot more than he lets on. Its one thing to states things on your site or during lectures which have been out there for some time and stated by many others. Take Icke`s assertion that Royals are lizzards…the MSM has repeated this globally for decades. Icke wrote an article saying the Isle of White was a drugs gateway aided by the authorities and local Freemasons…no one has sued Icke. The majority of Twitter users will say sorry and or pay up, The two Twitter celebs will act on their legal advice. My advice is that everyone should go to court and in each and every case, call HIM to the stand. He`s an old man with a dicky ticker. If he wants to play hard, then treat him hard!!

You`ve got to remember, Lord McAlpine was part of one of the worst UK governments in history. He was a political monster of his age, so don`t get soft, just because he`s an old man.

Apart from his theories, I`d say that Icke only releases a fraction of what he knows. While most of this can`t be supported by fact, he could ask a lot of very difficult questions.

As I have already said on this forum. Lord McAlpine has put himself in a difficult position if he were to be cross examined, because he has chosen to state that “he only went to Wrexham once and that he never visited any of the North Wales boys homes”….why does he need to state this? Why does he believe that by stating this, it somehow proves his innocence (not that I imply his guilt)??

All I am doing is questioning Lord McAlpine`s own choice of words and what he believes to be good spin…because he is a master of spin…bending the truth to creat new false realities, as pointed out in articles on this site.

The BBC blood money and the possible forced ITV settlement is a defensive wall. As we all know, neither has libled him, yet both are really protecing him and those that might also come under police investigation…LOL

Most people don`t bang in the Google search “elite paedophile names”. But what if Schofield had just said to Cameron “would you be interesed in a list of elite paedopiles”? No doubt Cameron would give some wishy washy answer and then Schofield turns to another camera (close up) and says “go on Google and search XYZ (no actual names) and you to can see the names”!! Now this is less libelous, but actually far more damaging to the elite and the people they seek to protect.

So no possiblity of libel, acting in the public interest and Schofield would probably have been sacked. Schofield decided to be polite and sincere to the PM and did the right thing. If you had evidence that some employees from the factory over the road from where you live were messing about with the local school children and you offered it the MANAGER and he said “take it to the police” and dropped the evidence on the ground (ITV table)….YOU`D BE VERY RIGHT TO BE CONCERNED, IN FACT, SHOCKED!! Especially when you and the MANAGER knows that the police can`t be trusted!! This is the really shocking thing…Cameron`s reaction to Schofield and his rejection of his legal responsibilities as leader of the Tory party and Prime Minister.

I never liked Schofield. I found him sickly sweet, but now I have a lot of respect for him …unless you think he was playing a part in the coverup?

The secret service have been using blackmail and entrapment since day one. Russia always used sex entrapment.
Pedo entrapment is just another variation but a sick one. If it is visiting Saudi Princes or top politicians. The Mafia / CIA tapped Marilyn Monroe with Kennedy. The Jimmy Saville exposure was getting far to many people coming forward. There was a danger of exposing the secret service role in maintaining the supply chain of new blood. Just picking up from Kings cross is no good. They like them young and a good selection.
This Newsnight set up was a way to stop the flow of people coming forward. To frighten them off. Steve Messham’s has been used to muddy the water. Lord McAlpines, deceased, cousin Jimmy McAlpine who lived in North Wales has been accused by some as being the McAlpine that has been confused with Loard McAlpine. But was this really the accident we are supposed to believe it was. But when you learn that Lord Mcapline wrote a bookThe New Machiavelli: The Art of Politics in Business McAlpine’s advice on dealing with the media? Spread false defeat to gain public sympathy; or false accusation and then arrange for it to be exposed as such – so the accuser will forever be treated with suspicion.’
Was the BBC Newsnight set up to fail. So that Lord Mcalpine who has been named as a alleged pedo for years. Could suddenly come out of the wood work to defend his reputation. Discredit Steve Messham and anyone twittering on about this. With big legal threats and hopefully frighten off people coming forward. Stopping the revelation of the pedo networks. That could not only bring down the government. But open up the can of worms of how the secret service controls those in power.